Recent Edits
| Editor | Region | Entry | Changes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Right to change legal gender | Edited Reverting to revision #63294: half of the provinces still require a diagnosis. | |
| user3330 | | Right to change legal gender | Edited Gender changes are legal in Canada. | |
| Vitek |  | Censorship of LGBT issues | ||
| Vitek | | Censorship of LGBT issues | Edited changing to censorship to state-enforced: prison/tracking measures unenforceable following april 2026 CJEU judgment, but underlying law… | |
| Nathan |  | Same-sex marriage | Edited Adding Domestic Abuse Act 2026 legal provision | |
| Sbr |  | LGBT employment discrimination | ||
| Sbr | | LGBT discrimination | ||
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted Source only includes one specific case. Entry is making broad claim, and inferring policy based on one incident. | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted Source does not mention anything about restroom access. | |
| ObservantClippy | | Bathroom access | ||
| ObservantClippy | | Bathroom access | ||
| carolinaslays |  | LGBT discrimination | Edited Copying information about gender identity + sources from other two entry edits made | |
| carolinaslays | | Intersex infant surgery | Edited Improving sources (fixing 1 dead link, adding additional source) and minor copyedit/phrasing improvements | |
| carolinaslays | | Bathroom access | Edited There is no explicit protection for transgender people to access bathrooms in New Zealand. Furthermore, there is no explicit sex-based… | |
| carolinaslays | | LGBT housing discrimination | Edited Clarify description with the accurate legal environment | |
| carolinaslays | | LGBT employment discrimination | Edited Clarify earlier point by explaining better and adding additional source | |
| carolinaslays | | LGBT employment discrimination | Edited Developing information in the legal field is really starting to make the idea that gender identity falls under sex quite unclear/unlikely… | |
| SeriousTuber |  | Homosexual activity | Edited The 2023 law criminalise sex without marriage by 2 January, 2026. | |
| SeriousTuber | | Homosexual activity | Edited Authorities says no one will fill report to them to prosecute them. | |
| Nathan |  | LGBT discrimination | Edited Adding another legal protection | |
| Nathan |  | LGBT discrimination | Edited Adding another legal protection | |
| Nathan | | LGBT discrimination | Edited end date changed | |
| Nathan |  | LGBT discrimination | Edited Adding another legal protection | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Gender-affirming care | Edited Couldn’t find a law banning it actually. | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Bathroom access | Edited Adding start date. | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Bathroom access | Edited Adding start date. | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Bathroom access | ||
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Bathroom access | Edited Recent developments suggest otherwise so it really is up to Wisconsin. In this case, it varies as to where it’s protected. | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Bathroom access | ||
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Bathroom access | ||
| DaisyGeekyTrans | | Bathroom access | ||
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Gender-affirming care | Edited We marked Liechtenstein as ambiguous for the same reason so why not Madagascar? | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Gender-affirming care | Edited It IS a matter of LGBTIQ+ rights hence why it’s a section. Keeping info but changing status back. | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Gender-affirming care | Edited Sounds restricted to me. We didn’t give Albania N/A. | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Gender-affirming care | Edited Restricted might work better since there is a population, albeit a tiny one. | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Gender-affirming care | Edited Restricted might work better since there is a population. | |
| DaisyGeekyTrans |  | Gender-affirming care | Edited Fixing grammar. | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted Does not mention bathroom access | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted Source does not mention anything about public accommodations. | |
| danlev | | Bathroom access | Deleted Source does not show that there are partial restrictions specifically for bathroom access | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted No sources to back claims. | |
| danlev | | Bathroom access | Deleted No sources to back claims. | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted No sources to back claims. | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted No sources to back claims. | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted No sources to back claims. | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted Weasel words, no sources to back claim | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted Weasel words, broad claims without citing. | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted Source does not back claim. And weasel words like "often" "frequent" and "extreme" | |
| danlev |  | Bathroom access | Deleted Source does not mention anything about bathrooms or facilities and does not back up the "frequently" | |
| danlev | | Bathroom access | Deleted Source does not mention anything about bathroom access. Broad claims with no sources. |