Entry #20837: LGBT employment discrimination in United States

Current Version

RegionUnited States
IssueLGBT employment discrimination
StatusSexual orientation only (De Facto)
Start DateJun 23, 2026
End Date(none)
DescriptionA federal investigator with the EEOC has confirmed in an email sent to Flint Del Sol; a transgender man, that the agency is “not permitted to conduct/continue any investigation regarding transgender cases, and that is coming from the chain of command” the Advocate reports.

Select states have explicit employment anti-discrimination laws in place for sexual orientation and gender identity. The federal government currently does not enforce the Bostock decision from 2020.

As early as June 5th, the EEOC released an NEP with the following priorities; "Remedying DEI-related race and sex discrimination, Protecting workers from anti-American national origin discrimination, Defending women’s rights to single-sex spaces at work and workers’ rights to express the binary nature of sex, and Protecting workers’ religious liberty rights to receive religious accommodations and be free from religious discrimination, harassment, and related retaliation."

The NEP also made a clarification of Bostock stating; "with respect to (i) employees’ right to single-sex intimate spaces; (ii) employers’ right to provide the same; (iii) employees’ and employers’ right to express the binary nature of sex; and (iv) to employees’ right to religious accommodations for sincerely held religious beliefs"

On June 29th, the EEOC voted to rescind "Affirmative Action Appropriate Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as Amended" and "Compliance Manual Section 607 on Affirmative Action"
Sourceshttps://www.advocate.com/politics/national/trump-eeoc-transgender-investigations
https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2026-06/NEP_-_signed.pdf
https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-votes-rescind-affirmative-action-interpretive-guidelines-and-related-compliance


Revision History (5)

edited by mineszilla. This is not a federal law as state agencies adhere to state law; not the federal. Individuals have the option to either file with the EEOC or the state agency in their respective state which adheres to separate policies.

Helpful?
0
Old Value New Value (Current)
Federal LawYesNo

edited by gengeros. a sexual orneation case in 2025 was prosecuted by the EEOC

Helpful?
0
Old Value New Value
Value(REMOVED)Sexual orientation only (De Facto)
Special StatusVaries by Region (De Facto)Sexual orientation only (De Facto)
Federal LawNoYes

edited by mineszilla. adding supporting evidence

Helpful?
0
Old Value New Value
DescriptionA federal investigator with the EEOC has confirmed in an email sent to Flint Del Sol; a transgender man, that the agency is “not permitted to conduct/continue any investigation regarding transgender cases, and that is coming from the chain of command” the Advocate reports.

Select states have explicit employment anti-discrimination laws in place for sexual orientation and gender identity. The federal government currently does not enforce the Bostock decision from 2020.
A federal investigator with the EEOC has confirmed in an email sent to Flint Del Sol; a transgender man, that the agency is “not permitted to conduct/continue any investigation regarding transgender cases, and that is coming from the chain of command” the Advocate reports.

Select states have explicit employment anti-discrimination laws in place for sexual orientation and gender identity. The federal government currently does not enforce the Bostock decision from 2020.

As early as June 5th, the EEOC released an NEP with the following priorities; "Remedying DEI-related race and sex discrimination, Protecting workers from anti-American national origin discrimination, Defending women’s rights to single-sex spaces at work and workers’ rights to express the binary nature of sex, and Protecting workers’ religious liberty rights to receive religious accommodations and be free from religious discrimination, harassment, and related retaliation."

The NEP also made a clarification of Bostock stating; "with respect to (i) employees’ right to single-sex intimate spaces; (ii) employers’ right to provide the same; (iii) employees’ and employers’ right to express the binary nature of sex; and (iv) to employees’ right to religious accommodations for sincerely held religious beliefs"

On June 29th, the EEOC voted to rescind "Affirmative Action Appropriate Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as Amended" and "Compliance Manual Section 607 on Affirmative Action"
Show Difference
A federal investigator with the EEOC has confirmed in an email sent to Flint Del Sol; a transgender man, that the agency is “not permitted to conduct/continue any investigation regarding transgender cases, and that is coming from the chain of command” the Advocate reports. Select states have explicit employment anti-discrimination laws in place for sexual orientation and gender identity. The federal government currently does not enforce the Bostock decision from 2020. 2020. As early as June 5th, the EEOC released an NEP with the following priorities; "Remedying DEI-related race and sex discrimination, Protecting workers from anti-American national origin discrimination, Defending women’s rights to single-sex spaces at work and workers’ rights to express the binary nature of sex, and Protecting workers’ religious liberty rights to receive religious accommodations and be free from religious discrimination, harassment, and related retaliation." The NEP also made a clarification of Bostock stating; "with respect to (i) employees’ right to single-sex intimate spaces; (ii) employers’ right to provide the same; (iii) employees’ and employers’ right to express the binary nature of sex; and (iv) to employees’ right to religious accommodations for sincerely held religious beliefs" On June 29th, the EEOC voted to rescind "Affirmative Action Appropriate Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as Amended" and "Compliance Manual Section 607 on Affirmative Action"
Sourceshttps://www.advocate.com/politics/national/trump-eeoc-transgender-investigationshttps://www.advocate.com/politics/national/trump-eeoc-transgender-investigations
https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2026-06/NEP_-_signed.pdf
https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-votes-rescind-affirmative-action-interpretive-guidelines-and-related-compliance
Show Difference
https://www.advocate.com/politics/national/trump-eeoc-transgender-investigations https://www.advocate.com/politics/national/trump-eeoc-transgender-investigations https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2026-06/NEP_-_signed.pdf https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-votes-rescind-affirmative-action-interpretive-guidelines-and-related-compliance
Reports (1)
  • Date is incorrect "Sexual orientation and gender identity/transgender status remain covered under federal employment-discrimination law through Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as interpreted by ''Bostock v. Clayton County'' (2020). Recent EEOC actions and reported investigation limits may weaken or narrow federal enforcement in practice, especially for transgender-related claims, but they do not repeal ''Bostock'' or remove federal Title VII coverage. Therefore, the status is not “no federal protection”; it is federal legal protection with contested or weakened enforcement, while state and local protections vary by jurisdiction. Sources: * ''Bostock v. Clayton County'', 590 U.S. ___ (2020): https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/590/17-1618/ * EEOC, “Sex-Based Discrimination”: https://www.eeoc.gov/sex-based-discrimination * EEOC, National Enforcement Plan, June 2026: https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2026-06/NEP_-_signed.pdf * ''The Advocate'', report on Flint Del Sol / EEOC transgender investigations: https://www.advocate.com/politics/national/trump-eeoc-transgender-investigations"

edited by UnknownMiles. Adding status qualifier

Helpful?
0
Old Value (Original) New Value
Qualifier(none)De Facto

created by mineszilla

Helpful?
0
Original entry
StatusVaries by Region
Start DateJun 23, 2026
End Date(none)
DescriptionA federal investigator with the EEOC has confirmed in an email sent to Flint Del Sol; a transgender man, that the agency is “not permitted to conduct/continue any investigation regarding transgender cases, and that is coming from the chain of command” the Advocate reports. Select states have explicit employment anti-discrimination laws in place for sexual orientation and gender identity. The federal government currently does not enforce the Bostock decision from 2020.
Sourceshttps://www.advocate.com/politics/national/trump-eeoc-transgender-investigations