Entry #10210: Censorship of LGBT Issues in Democratic Republic of the Congo

Current Version

RegionDemocratic Republic of the Congo
IssueCensorship of LGBT Issues
StatusAmbiguous
Start Datepast
End Datenow
DescriptionThe U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that While no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government. Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals.
Sourceshttps://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/


Revision History (5)

Revision by Pizzaslices412653. No known records found

Old Value New Value (Current)
ValueImprisonment as punishment(REMOVED)
Special Status(REMOVED)Ambiguous

Revision by Canadianstudent03. There is unfair Censorship to LGB in DRC

Old Value New Value
ValueNo censorshipImprisonment as punishment
DescriptionNo official censorship.The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that
While no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government.
Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals.
Show Difference
No official censorship. The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that While no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government. Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals.

Revision by Pizzaslices412653. Censorship is not official

Old Value New Value
ValueState-enforcedNo censorship
Reports (1)
  • Newer law has been passed "The DRC Government has issued a warning to media outlets to not promote LGBT issues in the country"

Revision by Pizzaslices412653. No actual censorship

Old Value New Value
ValueImprisonment as punishmentState-enforced
DescriptionThe U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that individuals who publicly engaged in same-sex consensual activities, such as, for example, kissing, were sometimes prosecuted under public indecency provisions "which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples.No official censorship.
Show Difference
The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that individuals who publicly engaged in same-sex consensual activities, such as, for example, kissing, were sometimes prosecuted under public indecency provisions "which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. No official censorship.

Revision by JohnQuebec98. Not enough information is shown on this country

Old Value (Original) New Value
ValueNo censorshipImprisonment as punishment
DescriptionIn Democratic Republic of the Congo, there are no laws restricting the discussion or promotion of LGBTQ+ topics.The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that individuals who publicly engaged in same-sex consensual activities, such as, for example, kissing, were sometimes prosecuted under public indecency provisions "which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples.
Show Difference
In Democratic Republic of the Congo, there are no laws restricting the discussion or promotion of LGBTQ+ topics. The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that individuals who publicly engaged in same-sex consensual activities, such as, for example, kissing, were sometimes prosecuted under public indecency provisions "which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples.
Sourceshttps://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/
Show Difference
https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

equaldex created this entry.